Ephiria: the governance and control layer for your AI, your agents and your automated processes
For law firms, insurers and highly regulated enterprise. Your policy decides what is permitted. Ephiria enforces it before the action completes, and writes a tamper-evident record of what happened and why.
Your people are already using AI. Some of it you approved, some of it you did not, and in both cases confidential and regulated data is being typed into models that sit outside your control. Behind them, agents and automated processes are executing actions across your systems without anyone reviewing each one.
Your policy covers all of this. What it cannot do is stop any of it at the moment it happens, or tell you afterwards what was allowed and on whose authority. That is where the regulatory exposure, the client questions and the uncontrolled spend all sit.
Ephiria closes that gap. It sits above your existing stack, so your current systems remain in place and your people continue to work as they do now.
Ephiria is one platform with three governed surfaces…
- Your people using AI. The Ephiria Gateway sits in the path between the user and the model, around every AI tool your teams already have, including those in use outside sanctioned channels.
- Your AI agents. Every action an agent takes is held, evaluated and disposed of before it executes, against a declared purpose, authority and budget set before the agent was ever allowed to run.
- Your automated processes. Workflows, integrations and system-to-system actions across your existing stack, governed to the same standard as everything else.
That third surface is where Ephiria separates from the market. A great many vendors are now talking about AI agent governance. Almost none of them govern the automated processes that have been executing across enterprises unsupervised for years, which is where a large share of real authority breaches actually happen. Ephiria governs the action, whether a person, an agent or a workflow is taking it.
What it does
Ephiria Redacts before the model sees it. Confidential and regulated data is removed on the way out and rehydrated when the answer returns from the model. Not a warning, a control. It also Enforces policy in the path of the action, not after it has already taken place. The unique Secure Interaction Layer (SIL) mediates the action itself rather than advising on it.
Understands the situation, not the prompt. Who is acting, on whose behalf, over what data, under what authority, inside which matter or workflow.
Checks the answer coming back. Sources verified, reasoning tested, before the output reaches the user.
Governs cost before spend is committed. Budgets set and enforced at the point of action, attributable to a matter, book or cost centre.
Writes a tamper-evident record of what happened and why. Written before the outcome takes effect, reconstructing what was allowed, what was blocked, what was redacted and by whose authority.
What this looks like in practice:
A solicitor summarising a client document. They paste a draft agreement into a general AI assistant. Ephiria removes the client identifiers and privileged content before the model receives it, rehydrates the summary on the way back, and records what was redacted, on which matter, and under whose authority. The solicitor gets the summary. The model never held the confidential material.
An agent settling a claim. The agent moves to authorise a payment above the limit it was given when it was created. Ephiria holds the action before it executes, checks it against that authority, and routes it for human approval rather than completing it. The attempt is recorded whether it is approved or refused.
An overnight integration moving data. A scheduled process begins transferring customer records to a third-party service never approved for that data class. Ephiria stops the transfer before it completes and writes the record. No AI was involved at any point, and it is exactly the kind of exposure most governance tooling never sees.
Why this is arriving now
The obligations hardened earlier this year when the SRA published a warning notice on the misuse of AI, stating that failure to have proper regard to it puts firms at risk of disciplinary action.
Clients and insurers are moving on their own timetable. Outside counsel guidelines are already carrying AI conditions, and whatever an organisation states about its AI controls on an insurance proposal form is a representation it may have to evidence.
None of those three parties is asking whether you have a policy. All three are asking what your controls did.
Most governance stops at the prompt: a filter, a log, a dashboard, or a warning that hands the decision back to the user. That is monitoring, and monitoring tells you what happened after it happened.
Ephiria enforces before the action completes, across seven governance layers, and proves what it did afterwards. The depth is the difference: context establishment, decision intelligence and model routing, policy resolution in a fixed order, economic governance, in-path enforcement, tamper-evident evidence, and a decision graph that sharpens the system over time rather than letting it decay.
Ephiria is live with enterprise clients across Europe, the Middle East, Asia and the United States, including a major telecommunications group, a global online retailer and sovereign wealth organisations. It is built by Jalubro with ten years inside regulated enterprise environments.
Ephiria is the platform previously delivered as J-10, now consolidated under a single brand.
To see how Ephiria can help with your governance and policy enforcement, book a demo with the team: https://calendly.com/nick-morgan-ephiria
